« Alex II » : différence entre les versions

De Lillois Fractale Wiki
Aller à la navigation Aller à la recherche
Contenu ajouté Contenu supprimé
Aucun résumé des modifications
Aucun résumé des modifications
Ligne 3 : Ligne 3 :
== History ==
== History ==


Alex I was developped between November 2009 and february 2010.
Alex I was developped between November 2009 and February 2010.It was based on thoughts and question slowly raising bewteen ~ 1990 and 2009.<br>


Alex I was developped without any evaluation of other similar studies or research in the scientific world.
Alex I was developped without any evaluation of other similar studies or research in the scientific world.
Ligne 13 : Ligne 13 :
*a too rigid description of the conscience
*a too rigid description of the conscience


In februray 2010, the Alex II&nbsp;project started on various fronts:
In Februray 2010, the Alex II&nbsp;project started on various fronts:


*first contacts with Iridia (H. Bersine) and Cental (C. Fairon)
*first contacts with Iridia (H. Bersini) and Cental (C. Fairon)
*various writings in French, thoughts and explorations rather than solutions and choices
*various writings in French, thoughts and explorations rather than solutions and choices
*a model overview in English (anchored here), a full description of the selected solution
*a model overview in English (anchored here), a full description of the selected solution
*the development of java classes forming a new Alex server side.
*the development of java classes forming a new Alex server side.

Alex II and Alex I, as java programs, share numerous developped components:

*tools
*data structures and persistence
*client server architecture
*teaching sources
*part of node &amp; link

New in Alex II&nbsp;are (limited to the major points):

*focus objects
*tripolar links
*concept and word layering


== Overview ==
== Overview ==

Version du 28 février 2010 à 14:34

The Model

History

Alex I was developped between November 2009 and February 2010.It was based on thoughts and question slowly raising bewteen ~ 1990 and 2009.

Alex I was developped without any evaluation of other similar studies or research in the scientific world.

It showed some promising perspectives, but also some significant limits:

  • the fusion beween words and concepts, which results in weaknesses, incoherences, conflicts, and unreachable areas
  • the lack of a correct implication of numeric cognition and processing
  • a too rigid description of the conscience

In Februray 2010, the Alex II project started on various fronts:

  • first contacts with Iridia (H. Bersini) and Cental (C. Fairon)
  • various writings in French, thoughts and explorations rather than solutions and choices
  • a model overview in English (anchored here), a full description of the selected solution
  • the development of java classes forming a new Alex server side.

Alex II and Alex I, as java programs, share numerous developped components:

  • tools
  • data structures and persistence
  • client server architecture
  • teaching sources
  • part of node & link

New in Alex II are (limited to the major points):

  • focus objects
  • tripolar links
  • concept and word layering

Overview

The following paragraphs and the linked pages describe the Alex II model.

Globally Alex II is organized in 2 levels:

  • the jelly level, autonomous, passive, the raw material
  • the conscience level, transient, dynamic, active, interacting, built on top of the jelly

Slowly dynamic part : the base jelly

The jelly includes nodes and links.

Basically, a node is a content holder. But in most case, this content is impossible to name and very difficult to describe!

Basically, a link is a connection between 2 or 3 nodes.

Links and nodes

Fives levels of nodes: concepts / words / variants / signals

Link classification

Concepts classification

Highly dynamic part : conscience and focus

A conscience is a tree of focuses.

The root focus is the only one to persist. Other are transitional.

A focus may be described as a thread (in java language understanding).

Focus object may be either target oriented or input-driven.

Implementation

Natural intelligence implementation

Dedicated hardware implementation

Implementation with Java emulation on standard hardware

Main features

Associative numeric process

Concept bubbling